Allowed

Sanjeev Kumar Jha @ Sanjeev and Anr. v. Satish Kumar Thakur and Anr.

Patna HC27 Feb 2020C.Misc./1060/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition filed under Article 226, holding that the limitation objection due to the available revision remedy was legally tenable. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate petition for redressal.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate petition for redressal.

Sanjeev Kumar Jha @ Sanjeev and Anr. Vs Satish Kumar… — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1060 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sanjeev Kumar Jha @ Sanjeev

¶4

Shyam Nandan Jha, both Sons of Shri Bishambhar Jha. both residents of Village- Madhpur, Post Office- Madhpur, Police Station Kamtoul, CircleSindhwara, District- Darbhanga, State- Bihar, Pin Code- 847306.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

Satish Kumar Thakur, Son of Shri Mohan Thakur, 2. Nathuni Raut, Son of Late Kanchan Raut, Both residents of VillageMadhpur, Post Office- Madhpur, Police Station- Kamtoul, CircleSindhwara, District- Darbhanga, State- Bihar, Pin Code- 847306.

¶8

... ... Respondent/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shyam Kishore Sinha, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent/s : ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 27-02-2020

¶12

At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent raises a preliminary objection with regard to non-maintainability of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution in view of the remedy by way of revision available to the petitioner.

¶13

After some arguments, Mr. Shyam Kishore Sinha learned counsel for the petitioner accepts the aforesaid legal position and seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate petition for redressal of his grievance.

¶14

Permission is accorded. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

¶15

It is made clear that in case such a petition is filed,

¶16

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1060 of 2018(2) dt.27-02-2020 2/2

¶17

the concerned authorities would have regard to the present proceeding being pursued by the petitioner while considering any issue relating to condonation of delay, if applicable.

¶18

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶19

Chandran/-

¶20

Sanjeev Kumar Jha @ Sanjeev and Anr. v. Satish Kumar Thakur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar Jha @ Sanjeev and Anr. v. Satish Kumar Thakur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Shankar Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Prasad and Ors. Vs Bihari Prasad

Dr. Manoj Kumar Singh Vs Dr. Bharat Choudhary and Ors.

Ajay Pratap Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Airports Authority of India Vs Bibi Rizwana Khatoon

Bhirgu Sav @ Bhirgu Lal Vs Madho Prasad