The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present writ application. Granting such relief, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9043 of 2020
======================================================
Rajesh Kumar Yadav @ Rajesh Yadav, S/o Dudh Nath Roy, R/O Mohalla - Barmasia, Mirchaibari, P.S. Katihar Sahayak, Distt. - Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vivek Prasad GP-7.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)
(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)
Date : 14-12-2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
veena/rajiv
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | |
| Transmission Date | NA |
Rajesh Kumar Yadav
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department
Sanjay Karol
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
