Disposed

Sangita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jun 2020CWJC/6147/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition was disposed of on mutually agreeable terms. The court directed the District Magistrate to consider and decide the petitioner's application expeditiously within four weeks, leaving all issues on merits open for future adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 6 (District Magistrate) to decide petitioner's application within four weeks. All other issues on merits left open.

Sangita Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6147 of 2020

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sangita Devi (female), aged about 32 years, wife of Sri Shiv Kumar Mahto, resident of Mohallah- Ward No. 3, Manjhauli Gram Panchayat, P.S.- Vaishali, District- Vaishali.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Principal Secretary, P.H.E.D, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Finance Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The District Development Commissioner, Vaishali.

¶12

The District Magistrate, Vaishali.

¶13

The Block Development Officer, Manjhauli Block, District- Vaishali.

¶14

The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj- Manjhauli, District- Vaishali.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, Advocate

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶20

and

¶21

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR

¶22

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶23

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶24

Date: 03-06-2020

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.6147 of 2020 dt.03-06-2020 2/4

¶27

counsel for the respondents.

¶28

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

¶29

“(i). For direction upon the respondent authority to complete the work of piped water supply in Ward No. 3, Majhauli Gram Panchayat, Manjhauli Block, District- Vaishali under the scheme of Mukhyamantri Pey Jal Nishchay Yojna through the Public Health and Engineering Department (hereinafter referred to as PHED).

¶30

(ii) For direction upon the respondent authority to supply the estimated cost of piped water supply in Ward No. 3 to the Ward Vikas Samiti.

¶31

(iii) For direction upon the respondent to transfer the fund in the account of Ward Vikas Samiti of Ward No. 3 as per estimate and recommendation of finance committee.

¶32

(iv) For direction upon the Respondent no. 6 to consider the application of the petitioner and after giving proper opportunity of hearing take decision in accordance with law.

¶33

(v) And/or for grant of any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled, in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

¶34

During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the respondent authority i.e. District Magistrate, Vaishali (Respondent No. 6) to consider and decide the

¶35

Patna High Court CWJC No.6147 of 2020 dt.03-06-2020 3/4

¶36

petitioner’s request so addressed to him (Annexure-2 and 3 series) expeditiously, in accordance with law.

¶37

Shri Sarvesh Kumar Singh learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State does not have any objection to the same.

¶38

As such, we dispose of the present petition on the following mutually agreeable terms:

¶39

(a). All issues on merits are left open.

¶40

(b) Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No. 6, namely, District Magistrate, Vaishali, to consider and decide the petitioner’s communications (Annexure-2 and 3 series) expeditiously and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of a copy of the present order.

¶41

¶42

(d) The communications of the petitioner shall be considered and action taken, if so required, strictly in accordance with law.

¶43

(e) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such other remedies as are available under law, if so required and desired, on the same and subsequent cause of action.

¶44

Patna High Court CWJC No.6147 of 2020 dt.03-06-2020 4/4

¶45

Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid

¶46

observations/directions.

¶47

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶48

(S. Kumar, J)

¶49

P.K.P./-

¶50

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date	03.06.2020
Transmission Date

Sangita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niraj Kumar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeev Kumar Singh, Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Keshav Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

St. Pauls International High School Vs The Union of India

Srikanta Chaudhari @ Srikant Chaudhari @ Srikant Sahni Vs The State of Bihar