Disposed

Sarswati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Sept 2020CWJC/5326/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna disposed of a writ petition seeking release of a seized motorcycle involved in illicit liquor cases. The Court directed the petitioner to appear in confiscation proceedings and granted provisional release of the vehicle contingent on providing ownership proof and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of seized motorcycle contingent on filing show cause undertaking, providing ownership proof, and furnishing sureties to the confiscating authority.

Sarswati Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5326 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sarswati Devi, Wife of Jageshwarr Sahani, Resident of Village Hanuman Nagar Ward No. 01, P.O.-Sahiara, P.S.-Sahiara, District-Sitamarhi.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principle Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Govt. of Bihar at Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate-Collector, Sitamarhi.

¶8

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.

¶10

The Officer-in-Charge, S.H.O. Bathanaha Police Station, Dist-Sitamarhi.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Navin Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar (S.C. 11) ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

¶13

Date : 04-09-2020

¶14

The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶16

counsel for the State.

¶17

Petitioner has prayed for following relief:-

¶18

“For the release of seized Bajaj Platina 100 motorcycle bearing its Registration No. BR30U3387 seized by the Bathanaha police and kept in night during night patrolling armed force came near Nirmala Petrol

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.5326 of 2020 dt.04-09-2020

¶20

2/4

¶21

Pump situated at N.H. 77, in connection with Bathanaha P.S. Case No. 208 /19 for offence under Section 30(a)(c) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 which is pending before the Collector, Sitamarhi.”

¶22

Allegation is recovery of illicit Nepali Soufy liquor from the seized motorcycle, as such, the vehicle is liable for confiscation under Section 56 of Excise Act.

¶23

It has been submitted on behalf of State that on recommendation made by police, confiscation proceeding being Confiscation Case No. 1041/19 has been initiated by the District Collector, Sitamarhi and notices were issued to the registered owner of the seized vehicle to appear and file his show cause.

¶24

The writ petition is disposed of with direction to petitioner to appear in the confiscation proceeding on 21.09.2020 if not already appeared and file his show cause and the confiscating officer shall conclude the confiscation proceeding within 60 days from date of filing of show cause, failing which, the vehicle shall be provisionally released till conclusion of confiscating proceeding on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name with two sureties (one local) to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document.

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.5326 of 2020 dt.04-09-2020 3/4

¶26

The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

¶27

(i) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

¶28

(ii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

¶29

(iii) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama.

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.5326 of 2020 dt.04-09-2020 4/4

¶31

With said direction and observations, this writ petition is

¶32

disposed of.

¶33

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶34

( S. Kumar, J)

¶35

veena/-

¶36

AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A. Uploading Date Transmission Date N.A.

Sarswati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarswati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjit Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Kumar Alias Rajan Kumar Das Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Through The Chief Managing Director and Ors.

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar