Disposed

Md. Junaid Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Jan 2020CWJC/231/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a land compensation award. The court directed the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner's objection under Section 21 of the 2013 Act within three months, ensuring an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Purnea to dispose off the petitioner's matter relating to the compensation award within three months.

Md. Junaid Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 231 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Junaid Alam, Male aged about 38 years, Son of Dr. Ishak, Resident of Village- Bansbari, P.O. and P.S.- Thakurganj, District- Kishanganj (Bihar).

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Collector-Cum- District Land Acquisition Officer Kishanganj, DistrictKishanganj (Bihar).

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Kashyap, AC to GP 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶11

Date : 13-01-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC

¶13

to GP 18 for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has moved the Court for the following

¶15

reliefs:

¶16

“I. To issue an appropriate writ/order /direction, in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Memo No. 296 dated 04.02.2019 issued by the Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Kishanganj by which it has been informed to the petitioner that the Award of the land of the Petitioner acquired for constructions of Araria-Galgalia New B. G. Rail Line has been ascertained as Rs. 2, 75,943/- (Rupees Two Lakh Seventy Five Thousand None Hundred Forty Two Only) and has been requested to receive the amount after producing appropriate papers of the land in question (as contained in Annexure-4).

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.231 of 2020 dt.13-01-2020 2/3

¶18

II. To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction, holding the Award of the compensation amount of Rs. 2, 75, 943/- under Section 23 & 30 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “2013 Act”) as illegal, null and void as the same has been prepared against the Principle of Natural Justice and without disposing of the objection, which was mandatorily required under Section 23 of the 2013 Act.

¶19

III. To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction, directing the Respondents to dispose of the objection of the Petitioner filed under Section 21 of the 2013 Act in the manner as laid down under Section 23 of the 2013 Act.

¶20

IV. To any other relief or reliefs for which the Petitioner is found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶21

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 3 today in which the stand is that along with the petitioner all similar matters have been referred to the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Purnea on 18.11.2019.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Authority may be directed to dispose off the matter within a fixed time period.

¶23

Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Purnea to dispose off the matter, as far as it relates to the petitioner, expeditiously and

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.231 of 2020 dt.13-01-2020 3/3

¶25

latest within three months from the date of production of a copy of this order, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including the petitioner.

¶26

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶27

P. Kumar

¶28

AFR/NAFR U T

Md. Junaid Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Junaid Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Sah Vs THe State Election Commission (Panchayat)

Most. Dharamshila Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Mostt. Malti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashok Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar

Tilak Ray Vs The State of Bihar