Disposed

Pinki Kumari @ Pinki Devi, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jan 2020CWJC/20958/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition concerning the petitioner's appointment as Sevika and quashing of another appointment. The Court directed the petitioner to submit grievances to the District Programme Officer within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file representation before the District Programme Officer within six weeks; writ application disposed.

Pinki Kumari @ Pinki Devi, Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20958 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pinki Kumari @ Pinki Devi, Wife of Niranjan Singh, Resident of VillageMajlispur, Police Office-Bhainsmara, Police Station-Garkha, District-Saran, Pin Code-841311.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Saran.

¶8

The District Programme Officer, Saran.

¶9

The Child Development Project Officer, Garkha, Saran.

¶10

The Prarchchhika, Garkha Block, Saran.

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Garkha, Saran.

¶12

Sindhu Sinha, Wife of Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageMajlispur, Post Officer-Bhainsmara, Police Station-Garkha, District-Saran, Pin Code-841311.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.M.K. Upadhyay, A.C. to G.P.-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 10-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶17

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶18

The petitioner has come to this Court for a direction to

¶19

the respondent-authorities to appoint her on the post of Sevika after quashing the appointment of Respondent No.7 and for grant of other ancillary reliefs.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State submits that appropriate remedy with regard to the nature of the dispute lies with the District Programme Officer and, therefore, the petitioner must

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.20958 of 2019(2) dt.10-01-2020 2/2

¶22

address her grievances before the District Programme Officer, Saran.

¶23

In view of the aforementioned circumstances, the present writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file her representation before the District Programme Officer, Saran, who shall address himself to the issue and the dispute at hand within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, along with the representation in which detailed grievances of the petitioner should be enumerated.

¶24

Needless to say that the District Programme Officer shall pass an order after giving notice and hearing all the parties. The writ application thus stands disposed of.

¶25

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶26

PNM

¶27

Pinki Kumari @ Pinki Devi, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pinki Kumari @ Pinki Devi, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamla Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kriti Bharti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Ravi Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Basuki Nath Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Neelu Kumari @ Nilu Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Braj Bhushan Mishra Vs The State of Bihar