The High Court of Patna, in an oral order, disposed of a writ application regarding family pension. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a representation with the respondents, directing them to decide within four months.
Liberty granted to file representation; directed to be considered and decided within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16802 of 2017
======================================================
Swaraj Kumar, Son of Late Achuta Nand Sharma, resident of Village- Nonahi, P.O. - Kako, District - Jehanabad under guardianship of his mother, namely, Most. Usha Devi.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.
The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For
Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
The following reliefs have been sought for on behalf
of the petitioner in the present writ application.
“1. (I) For issuance of a writ of or in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the Sr. Divisional Commissioner/RPF Eastern Railway, Howrah (1) for payment of Family
Patna High Court CWJC No.16802 of 2017(3) dt.24-06-2020 2/3
Pension to the youngest son of Late Achutanand Sharma, which has not attained the age of maturity as well as other retiral dues of his Late father, till attaining the age of maturity. (ii) For issuance of a writ of or in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents concerned to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner before the authority concerned dated 08.07.17.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that
the petitioner may be granted liberty to make/file a representation before the respondent no. 2 i.e., the Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, R.P.F., Eastern Railway, Howrah, for redressal of his grievance as raised in the present writ application.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner is granted liberty to make/file a representation before the respondent no. 2 i.e., the Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, R.P.F., Eastern Railway, Howrah, for redressal of his grievance.
In case, any such representation is made/filed by the petitioner before the respondent no. 2, the respondent no. 2 i.e., the Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, R.P.F., Eastern Railway, Howrah, shall consider the representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law,
Patna High Court CWJC No.16802 of 2017(3) dt.24-06-2020 3/3
within a period of four months, from the date of filing/making of such representation.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.
U.K./- U
(Sudhir Singh, J)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be granted liberty to file a representation for redressal of grievance regarding family pension and retirement dues.
Whether the respondent shall consider the representation and pass an order within four months.
Swaraj Kumar
Union Of India
Sr. Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF, Eastern Railway, Howrah
Assistant Security Commissioner, Eastern Railway, Kolkata
Account Officer, Pension FA and CAO, Eastern Railway, Kolkata
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
