Disposed

Pankaj Kumar Ray v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2020CWJC/1333/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, via an oral order, directed the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-CEO, Zila Parishad, Rohtas, to consider the petitioner's transfer representation and dispose of it within three months, relying on specific service rules.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Dy. Development Commissioner-cum-CEO, Zila Parishad, Rohtas to consider the petitioner's transfer representation and dispose of it within three months.

Pankaj Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1333 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pankaj Kumar Ray Son of Sri Vivekanand Ray Resident of Village-Ramnagar P.O. Sedahan P.S. Tarari, District Bhojpur at Presently Posted as Niyojit Teacher, Upgraded Secondary School Motha, Karakat District Rohtas.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Department of Human Resources, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶11

The Deputy Development Commissioner Cum Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶12

The District Education Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶13

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶14

The Chairman, Zila Parishad, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶15

The Secretary Cum the Chief Executive Officer, Secondary/Higher Secondary Teacher/Librarian Niyojan Samittee, Zila Parishad, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance :

¶19

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Harsh Anuj For the Respondent/s : Mr.Madanjeet Kumar (GP20)

¶20

======================================================

¶21

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶22

2 21-01-2020 Heard both sides.

¶23

The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondent No.6 to dispose of the representation of the petitioner which is filed for his transfer from one school to another.

¶24

I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.1333 of 2020(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2

¶26

respondent No.6-Dy. Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Rohtas to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the provisions as contained in Rule 10 of Zila Parishad Teachers (Employment and Service Conditions) Rules and dispose of the same within three months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶27

With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶28

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶29

Saurabh/-

¶30

Pankaj Kumar Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Raghunath Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Vikrma Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Nilam Devi, Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Siya Devi Vs The State of Bihar