Partly allowed

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar, Through Principal Secretary, Home, Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

Patna HC9 Jan 2020CR. WJC/953/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal writ petition concerning threats faced by the petitioner and his family, the Court granted liberty to approach the Director General of Police for security arrangements.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to approach Respondent No.3 for appropriate security measures and disposal within eight weeks.

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.953 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2017 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajesh Kumar Son of Late Harihar Prasad Resident of Arfabad, Rithi Gali, P.S. - Alamganj, District - Patna, Bihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Home, Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

¶9

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Inspector General of Police, Patna Range, Patna.

¶11

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

¶12

The S.H.O. Alamganj Police Station, District Patna, Bihar.

¶13

Mangal Sao son of Shankar Sao

¶14

Shankar Sao son of Kishori Prasad Both residents of Dhamol, P.S. Pakaribarawa, District Nawada.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kr. Singh, Adv. Ms. Tolika Singh, Adv. Mrs. Sudha Chandra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Sharma, AC to AG ======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 09-01-2020 The present petition has been filed for providing security to the petitioner and his family members on account of the threats issued to the petitioner and his family members by the private respondents No. 7 and 8.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the father of the petitioner was killed by the respondents no. 7 and 8, whereafter it has become difficult for the petitioner and

¶21

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.953 of 2017(2) dt.09-01-2020 2/2

¶22

family members to visit district Nawada.

¶23

Having regard to the limited prayer made by the petitioner in the present petition, I deem it fit and proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent no.3 by filing appropriate representation, which shall be dealt with appropriately and disposed of within a period of eight weeks of the filing of the same.

¶24

The present petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

¶25

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶26

Tiwary/-

¶27

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar, Through Principal Secretary, Home, Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar, Through Principal Secretary, Home, Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Barun Kumar Puri and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vikash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Ram Udai Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Monalisha Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Superintendent Of Police, Bhagalpur and Anr.

Kanhaiya Parsad Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Electricity Department ,govt .of Bihar Office S