Disposed

Vinay Kumar Rai v. the State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Patna HC24 Feb 2020CR. WJC/154/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners seeking remission after over 20 years in jail. The High Court held detention is not illegal as they are convicted by a competent court. Liberty granted; authorities to consider request within four weeks. Petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to submit case to Remission Board; authorities directed to consider request within four weeks. Petition disposed of.

Vinay Kumar Rai Vs the State of Bihar through… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.154 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-388 Year-1996 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VINAY KUMAR RAI Son of Satya Narayan Rai Resident of VillageMuradabad, P.S. - Sasaram (Muffasil), District - Rohtas.

¶5

Ajit Kumar Rai @ Ajit Narayan Rai Son of Satya Narayan Rai Resident of Village- Muradabad, P.S. - Sasaram (Muffasil), District - Rohtas.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA Bihar

¶9

The Union of India through Home Secretary, New Delhi. Delhi.

¶10

The State Sentence Remission Board through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Home, Govtt. of Bihar Bihar

¶11

The Joint Secretary Cum Director (Administration), Home Department(Prison), Bihar, Patna.

¶12

¶13

The Secretary, Law Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶14

The Additional Director General of Police, Criminal investigation Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶15

The Inspector General, Jail and Reforms Services, Bihar, Patna.

¶16

The Assitant Inspector General, Jail and Reforms Services, Bihar, Patna.

¶17

The Jail Superintendent, Sasaram Jail, Sasaram, Rohtas. Bihar

¶18

... ... Respondent/s

¶19

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kanhaiya Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶20

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶21

4 24-02-2020

¶22

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶23

learned counsel for the respondents.

¶24

Petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s):-

¶25

“For a direction upon respondent no.3 State

¶26

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.154 of 2020(4) dt.24-02-2020 2/2

¶27

Remission Board to consider the case of the petitioners for remission and release the petitioners from jail who have completed the sentences for more than 20 years from jail manual i.e. more than 14 calendar year, in the light of the recommendation of the S.P. Rohtas (local police), District Prohibition Officer, Jail Superintendent and others.”

¶28

In our view, petitioners’ detention, at this point in time, cannot be said to be illegal, for they stand convicted in relation to crime registered as Sasaram (Muffasil town) P.S. Case No.388/1996.

¶29

The order of conviction and sentence is passed by a court having competent jurisdiction. In fact, petitioners’ prayer is for grant of remission/release, by taking recourse to appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

¶30

Liberty granted.

¶31

We are sure that as and when such request is received,

¶32

the authorities shall consider the same within four weeks.

¶33

The petition is accordingly, disposed of.

¶34

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶35

( S. Kumar, J)

¶36

pallavi/-

¶37

Vinay Kumar Rai v. the State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Kumar Rai v. the State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Preity Roy Vs The Principal Secretary To The Governor and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Puja Kumari Vs the State of Bihar, through the Principal Sectt., Home Police Dept. Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Muskan Kumari Vs the State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna