Allowed

Dhanji Kumar @ Dhananjai Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Feb 2020CR. MISC./9601/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court confirmed provisional bail for two petitioners accused under sections 307/34 IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act, subject to conditions regarding court attendance and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail confirmed on conditions of regular appearing in court and not tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Dhanji Kumar @ Dhananjai Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State of… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9601 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2018 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dhanji Kumar @ Dhananjai Kumar Singh Son of Sri Suresh Singh Resident of Village- Amaon, P.S.- Karamchat, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua.

¶5

Chitranjan Kumar Son of Dinesh Singh Resident of Village- Amaon, P.S.Karamchat, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua.

¶6

... ... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Rameshwar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.Dinesh Singh, Addl Public Prosecutor

¶9

======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 14-02-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State.

¶13

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under sections 307/34 Indian Penal Code and under section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and the FIR does not disclose who had fired the shot. Further, no case under the aforesaid sections is made out against the petitioners who do not have any criminal antecedent.

¶15

In the facts of the case, provisional bail allowed to the petitioners under order dated 18.2.2019 is hereby confirmed on the following conditions:-

¶16

(1) Petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶17

(2) If the petitionerd tamper with the evidence or the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9601 of 2019(4) dt.14-02-2020 2/2

¶19

witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶20

Shashi

¶21

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

U T

Dhanji Kumar @ Dhananjai Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhanji Kumar @ Dhananjai Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Ram @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitu Kumar @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Vs The State of Bihar

Anita Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar