Allowed

Amar Nut v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Feb 2020CR. MISC./926/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case under sections 30 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, directing surrender within six weeks and posting a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail upon surrender within six weeks by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Amar Nut Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.926 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-848 Year-2019 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AMAR NUT Son of Late Chhathu Nut Resident of Village - Pakaha Nut Toli, Behind High School, P.S. - Marhowrah, District - Saran at Chapra

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 848 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under sections 30 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

As per allegation in the FIR, on receiving secret information a raid was conducted and from a field, 385 litres of spirit said to be belonging to one Arun Pandey was recovered. It is further stated that two persons were seen fleeing away and one of them was later identified as being the petitioner.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations as levelled against the petitioner in the FIR

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.926 of 2020(2) dt.25-02-2020 2/2

¶17

are false and concocted. No recovery of incriminating article has taken place from possession of the petitioner. He has no concern either with the said Arun Pandey or with the recovered articles and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case no. 848 of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Saran at Chapra subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

sushma/- U T

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

Amar Nut v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amar Nut v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirgun Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Mangal @ Mannu @ Mannu Kumar @ Mangal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pradip Kumar Singh @ Pradeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Usha Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Kumar Chaudhary @ Arbind Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Matol Singh @ Rajeev Singh Vs The State of Bihar