Allowed

Mukesh Kumar @ Madan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Mar 2020CR. MISC./9174/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sudhir Singh granted bail to the petitioner in a case concerning unlawful possession of railway property. The petitioner, a co-passenger with no criminal record, was released upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya.

Mukesh Kumar @ Madan Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9174 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA RPF/POST District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH KUMAR @ MADAN Son of Ramavtar Prasad @ Ramaautar Yadav Resident of Village - Fatehpur, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 04-03-2020

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act.

¶14

Allegation is that the accused persons looted computer peripherals, which were booked from Anand Vihar railway station.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2019 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge that the railway property being kept in the car in question. The car in question does not belong to the petitioner. He was co-passenger

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9174 of 2020(2) dt.04-03-2020 2/2

¶17

in the car. Other co-accused have been granted bail vide Cr.Misc.No.13229 of 2020 and 3680 of 2020.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya in connection with R.P.F. Gaya P.S. case No.26 of 2019.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

Mukesh Kumar @ Madan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar @ Madan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Jifran @ Md. Jafar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Mandal @ Sanjeev Vs the State of Bihar

Harichand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar