Allowed

Chandrika Mahato v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Feb 2020CR. MISC./87235/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an anticipatory bail petition filed by parents-in-law of the informant in a Barauli police case involving offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 376, 302, and 420. The court granted relief as no overt act was attributed to the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of similar amount upon arrest or surrender within six weeks.

Chandrika Mahato Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87235 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2019 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandrika Mahato Son of Late Vishun Mahato

¶5

Laljhari Devi @ Lalchhari Devi Wife of Chandrika Mahato both Residents of Village - Kalyanpur, P.S.- Barauli (O.P. Madhopur), District- Gopalganj

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Renuka Ratnakar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 20-02-2020

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as

¶14

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Barauli (Madhopur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 70/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 376, 302 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Petitioners happen to be parents-in-law of the informant and the first information report (complaint petition) goes to show that entire allegation of rape centres around coaccused Rajesh Mahto and, similarly, the accusation of murder of informant’s husband centres around co-accused Rajesh Mahto and co-accused Dinesh Mahto and so far as the petitioners are concerned, no overt act has been attributed

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87235 of 2019(3) dt.20-02-2020 2/2

¶18

against them.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within six weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate XIV, Gopalganj/concerned court in Barauli (Madhopur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 70/2019 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶21

Spd/-

¶22

U T

Chandrika Mahato v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrika Mahato v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muhammad Mumtaz Ali Vs Mohammad Amin Hussain and Anr.

Manju Lath Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Thakur @ Vijay Uday Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Munni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Om Mandal @ Om Nandal Vs The State of Bihar

Mithu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar