Allowed

Kanhaiya Yadav @ Kanhaiya Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jun 2020CR. MISC./832/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving assault and criminal mischief, allowing release on personal bond subject to specific conditions during the lockdown.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail on personal bond within six weeks; post-normalcy, furnish Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties.

Kanhaiya Yadav @ Kanhaiya Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.832 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-685 Year-2019 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

KANHAIYA YADAV @ KANHAIYA KUMAR Son of Aarma Yadav Resident of Village-Laxmipur Gadariya, P.S.-Raghunathpur O.P., District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 17-06-2020

¶13

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶14

taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶15

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For

¶16

Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶18

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 332, 427, 188 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

The prosecution case, in short, is that while the informant was serving a notice on the petitioner, he became infuriated, destroyed the said notice and misbehaved with the informant.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.832 of 2020(3) dt.17-06-2020 2/3

¶21

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner had no intention to commit the alleged occurrence. Due to hot exchange of words between the parties, a scuffle had taken place. The petitioner has been made accused due to mistake of fact.

¶22

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Turkauliya (Raghunathpur) P.S. Case No. 685 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of seven weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.832 of 2020(3) dt.17-06-2020 3/3

¶26

with the aforesaid case.

¶27

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶28

Pankaj/-

¶29

U T

Kanhaiya Yadav @ Kanhaiya Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Yadav @ Kanhaiya Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sashi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Krishan Mohan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mohitlal Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar