Allowed

Sheonath Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jun 2020CR. MISC./81708/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner in connection with an FIR alleging an offense under IPC Sections 341, 356, 382, 376, and 511/34, subject to conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 and surrender within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount and surrender within six weeks.

Sheonath Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81708 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHEONATH SAHNI Son of Late Achchelal Sahni @ Achchelal @ Late Achhay Lal Resident of Village - Imadpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party.

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 22-06-2020

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶14

learned A.P.P. for the State through Video Conferencing.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.115 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 356, 382, 376 and 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The accusation is that the informant along with her brother Vikram Kumar was going to the house of her maternal aunt to give the marriage invitation card. In the way, four persons started scuffling with them and snatched the mobile, Mangal-Sutra, cash Rs.2000/- etc. of the informant. They also tried to take the informant towards the Railway Quarter. On ‘hullah’, all fled away from there. The informant claimed that

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81708 of 2019(3) dt.22-06-2020 2/2

¶18

four persons, named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner were indulged in committing the aforesaid crime.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the co-villager of the maternal aunt of the informant and there is dispute in between the maternal aunt of the informant and the petitioner, due to that reason, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶20

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.115 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶22

P.S./-

Sheonath Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheonath Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dharamveer Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dhaniya Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Nirmala Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar