Allowed

Sanjay Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Feb 2020CR. MISC./81230/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case alleging assault and robbery, directing surrender within 12 weeks and furnishing a bond with two sureties subject to Cr.P.C. Section 438(2) conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail for surrender within 12 weeks upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount.

Sanjay Mahto Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81230 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1085 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJAY MAHTO Son of Late Dayali Mahto Resident of Village - Harla, P.S.- Town ( Kadirganj O.P), District - Nawada

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 14-02-2020 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341,323,504,307 and 379 of the IPC.

¶12

It is alleged that on 12.9.2019 when the informant was irrigating his land, in the meantime, the petitioner and other accused persons came, stopped the pumping set engine and thereafter the petitioner assaulted with Khanti on the head of the informant. It is further alleged that the accused persons took gold chain of the informant worth rupees seventy thousand.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the background of land dispute, the accusation has been levelled and the injury has been found to be simple in nature. Though the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81230 of 2019(2) dt.14-02-2020 2/2

¶15

petitioner is accused in another case but in the said case he has not been sent up for trial.

¶16

Learned counsel for the informant submits that the accusation of assault is specific against the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the genesis of the occurrence, there is no accusation of repeating the blow, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender within 12 weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nawada in connection with Town (Kadirganj OP) P.S. Case No.1085 of 2019 subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

anil/-

¶20

Sanjay Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalsahab Pathak @ Lalsahab Kumar Pathak Vs The State of Bihar

Birbal Mushar @ Vimal Mushar @ Bhimal Mushar Vs The State of Bihar

Dhananjay Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sushma Kumari Vs the State of Bihar