Allowed

Naresh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jan 2020CR. MISC./70184/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court issued an oral order granting anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest in a liquor offence case. The court noted no recovery from them and ordered release on conditions including cooperation with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail for thirty days or until arrest/surrender, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties of the same amount.

Naresh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70184 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2019 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NARESH YADAV, Son of Late Narayan Prasad

¶5

Ram Prasad, Son of Daso Prasad, both Resident of Village - Bahuara, P.S. - Sirdala, District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 17-01-2020

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶17

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶18

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶19

Submission is that recovery of liquor is not alleged from possession of the petitioners. Rather name of the petitioners surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Jayram Prasad from whose possession liquor was recovered. Petitioners have stated on oath that they have got no criminal antecedent. There is no material to substantiate that the petitioners are going to tamper with the evidence or abscond the process of law.

¶20

Considering the fact that there is no substantial

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70184 of 2019(3) dt.17-01-2020 2/2

¶22

material against the petitioners to compel the petitioners to go to jail, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Sirdala Police Station Case No. 310 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶23

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶24

Kundan/-

¶25

U T

Naresh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahdev Ravidas Vs the State of Bihar

Aslam Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Aman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shivkali Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kamal Ray Vs The State of Bihar