The court rejected the petitioner's prayer for regular bail in Cust. Q. Os. Case No.98 of 2019 involving robbery under Section 394 IPC, ordering him to renew the application after six months.
Prayer for regular bail rejected; directed to renew after six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69152 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2019 Thana- TARAPUR District- Munger
======================================================
RANJAN CHOUDHARY Son of Shyam Sundar Choudhary, Resident of Village-Makwa, P.S-Tarapur, District-Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
5 01-06-2020
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State through virtual court proceeding.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Tarapur P.S. Case No.98 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per FIR, on 07.07.2019 at about 6.00 hours in the evening, the informant was returning with the passenger after completing the daily duty as driver with Tata Magic and in the way, four miscreants intercepted and looted money, license and mobile phone. The informant could identify the present petitioner who was one of the persons who involved in committing the road robbery and later on, police has chased him and recovered the looted amount, including he has confessed his guilt to be involved in the said offence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69152 of 2019(5) dt.01-06-2020 2/2
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is in custody since 09.07.2019.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present and accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Mahesh/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case of robbery.
Whether the petitioner's prayer for regular bail merits acceptance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjan Choudhary
The State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
