The petitioner sought permission to withdraw an application after processes were issued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court allowed the withdrawal.
Permission granted to withdraw the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67927 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-597 Year-2018 Thana- MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE District- Madhepura
======================================================
VIJAY KUMAR Son of Sri Narayan Yadav Resident of Village-Bariyahi, P.SShankarpur, District-Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shekhar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 17-01-2020 After some argument, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application on the ground that in this case processes under Section 138 N.I. Act has been issued, which is bailable in nature.
Accordingly, this application is disposed of as
withdrawn.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
sunilkumar/-
U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Kumar
The State of Bihar
Vishwajit Kumar Singh
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
