Disposed
Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./63422/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 63422 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai
======================================================
Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Yadav, aged about 25 years, male, Son of Sitaram Yadav Resident of Village - Bujurgabad, P.S.- Garhpura, District - Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Indu Kumari Srivastava ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 05-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mahila (Begusarai) P.S. Case No. 06 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 376, 323, 341 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, the petitioner came at the house of the informant in the night and told her on mobile to open the door and thereafter, it is alleged that he caught her and brought in a field and committed rape with her.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that medical report does not support the accusation of rape. It is further submitted that in the course of investigation, in paragraph 32 of the case diary, police has found the case true only under Section 354(B) of the IPC and other sections of the IPC with SC/ST Act,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63422 of 2019(4) dt.05-02-2020 2/2
not under Section 376 of the IPC. It is further submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. Informant is a daily-wage labourer. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.
In view of aforesaid facts & circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Mahila (Begusarai) P.S. Case No. 06 of 2019 on the following conditions:
“(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.”
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)
anay
U T
Jitendra Kumar
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court