Allowed

Md. Shahnawaz Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jun 2020CR. MISC./51725/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, husband accused in a dowry case, on his personal bond subject to converting to regular bail with a bond and sureties upon restoration of normalcy due to COVID-19 lockdown.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail on personal bond subject to conditions of proof and surrendering regular bail with bond and sureties within seven weeks.

Md. Shahnawaz Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51725 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. SHAHNAWAZ ALAM, (Male), aged about 22 years, Son of Md. Shakoor @ Sakoor Sheikh, Resident of Gulzar Nagar, Bhadauni, P.S.Nawada Town, District- Nawada.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Apsara Khatoon @ Afsana Khatoon (Female), Wife of Md. Shahnawaz Alam, D/O - Md. Israfil Resident of Village - Pipra, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya.

¶9

... ... Opposite Parties

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the O.P. No. 2 : M/S. Arun Kumar Bhagat and Asif Klim, Advocates. For the State : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 12-06-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶13

taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶14

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶15

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, opposite party no. 2 and learned counsel for the State.

¶16

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) of the I.P.C. and 3/4 of the D.P. Act.

¶17

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to non-

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51725 of 2019(6) dt.12-06-2020 2/3

¶19

fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶20

Vide order dated 16.11.2019, earlier the matter was

¶21

referred to the Mediation Center, Patna High Court Legal Services Committee. The report of the Mediator is kept on record at Flag-’D’. It appears from the report of the Mediator that the mediation has failed.

¶22

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is the husband of the victim. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) P.L.J.R. 182.

¶23

On behalf of the State and opposite party no. 2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.

¶24

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51725 of 2019(6) dt.12-06-2020 3/3

¶26

on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nawada, in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 376 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶27

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of seven weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶28

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶29

U.K./- U T

Md. Shahnawaz Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Shahnawaz Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeev Kumar Patel @ Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arvind Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Choudhary @ Ranjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Ravi Vs The State of Bihar

Shamsher Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar @ Dipu Vs The State of Bihar