Allowed

Raja Babu Mahto @ Rajababu Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jun 2020CR. MISC./4180/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a prohibition case involving illicit liquor. The court admitted the plea prima facie due to clean antecedents and lack of recovery from the petitioner's possession, directing him to appear within four weeks upon arrest.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for a period of four weeks or until arrest/surrender, on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Raja Babu Mahto @ Rajababu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4180 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-748 Year-2019 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJA BABU MAHTO @ RAJABABU MAHTO Son of Shyambabu Mahto @ Shyam Babu Mahto Resident of Mohalla - Sahebganj, Adda No. 2, Ward No. 29, P.S.- Chapra Town, Distt - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 23-06-2020

¶12

The present petition has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Gauri Shankar Gupta, the learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Saran (Chapra) Town P.S. Case No. 748 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 41(i) (ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

The case of the prosecution in brief is that on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the informant and other police personnel had conducted raid at the alleged place of

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4180 of 2020(2) dt.23-06-2020 2/3

¶17

occurrence i.e. the house of Dilip Mahto and from there, 677. 490 liters of illicit liquor was recovered. It is alleged that at the said place, the mother of the petitioner was found standing and was apprehended by the police from the spot, who disclosed that his son had fled away after seeing the police.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent, no illicit liquor has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, he is having a clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case merely on the so-called confessional statement of his mother, which, in any event, does not have any evidentiary value. It is further submitted that since no recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has not been arrested from the spot, no case is made out under the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, hence the bar under section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 shall not be attracted in the present case thus there is no impediment in grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4180 of 2020(2) dt.23-06-2020 3/3

¶22

case, considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the fact that no recovery of illicit liquor has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the petitioner is having a clean antecedent, this Court finds that prima facie no case is made out under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, hence this Court deems it fit and proper to admit the petitioner to the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶23

Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners above-named, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, Excise, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 748 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

¶24

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶25

Tiwary/-

¶26

U T

Raja Babu Mahto @ Rajababu Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Babu Mahto @ Rajababu Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purushottam Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jaynarayan Mahto, Vs The State of Bihar

Sudin Mistri, Vs The State of Bihar

Radhey Kushwaha @ Radha Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar

Nirmala Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Naraian Kumar @ Naraian Prasad Vs The State of Bihar