Allowed

Sewaki Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2020CR. MISC./3474/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to petitioners facing arrest in a criminal case involving assault and other offences. The court directed them to surrender within 30 days and furnish bail bonds with sureties subject to Section 438(2) conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners were released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- each with two sureties, to surrender within 30 days.

Sewaki Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3474 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2017 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SEWAKI DEVI, Wife of Nathuni Chaupal

¶5

Soman Chaupal, Son of Late Khubi Chaupal

¶6

Nathuni Chaupal, Son of Late Jeebach Chaupal, All Resident of Village - Nahar Baluaha, P.S. - Pandaul, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 21-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The co-accused persons, who allegedly caused injury at the head of the named injureds, are not petitioners herein. Petitioners are carrying general and omnibus nature of allegation of commission of assault. Similarly situated some other co-accused have already been allowed anticipatory bail by the learned court below itself vide order dated 08.03.2018 passed in A.B.P. No. 1485 of 2017. There is no material to substantiate that the petitioners are going to tamper with the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3474 of 2020(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2

¶18

evidence or abscond the process of law.

¶19

Hence, let the petitioners, above named, in the event

¶20

of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Pandaul Police Station Case No. 32 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners and also both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

¶21

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶22

Kundan/-

¶23

U T

Sewaki Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sewaki Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Mistri Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar