husband had moved for anticipatory bail, the same was granted by a co-ordinate Bench by order dated 15.05.2012 in Cr. Misc. No. 17242 of 2012. However, it was submitted that due to total lack of communication/information to the petitioner that such order was passed which required her to surrender and take bail before the Court below within six weeks, the benefit of the said order could not be taken by the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that even otherwise the Court may take into consideration the fact that there was absolutely no reason for the petitioner not to surrender and take bail as already she had an order in her favour and it is not open to reason as to why somebody having a favorable order would not take advantage of the same, which clearly proves that she was never made aware of such order. Learned counsel submitted that she belongs to a poor family. It was submitted that she is a 73 years old lady and is mother-in-law of the deceased, who was daughter of the informant. Learned counsel submitted that the death occurred just after two months from the date of marriage which also indicates that there was no foul play, for the reason that even if it is accepted that the petitioner and her family members were demanding dowry, it is not believable that they would kill her so soon without giving sufficient time for fulfillment of the demand. Learned counsel submitted that the
