Allowed

Om Prakash Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Feb 2020CR. MISC./3170/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed the bail application of the petitioner, who faced charges under the Indian Penal Code and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court enlarged him on bail subject to furnishing a bond and compliance with specific conditions regarding trial cooperation and evidence preservation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two like sureties subject to specific conditions.

Om Prakash Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3170 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2019 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran

¶3

====================================================== OM PRAKASH SAHNI Son of Panna Lal Sahni Resident of VillageKuwara, P.S.- Harsidhi, Distt- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶4

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Appearance :

¶7

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara

¶8

======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 28-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

¶12

with Harsidhi P.S. Case No.317 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 272, 273, 308 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Ac, 2016.

¶13

As per prosecution case, recovery of 105 litre of country made liquor from three motorcycles.

¶14

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged recovery as it was not recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that mandatory provision of Section 100 Cr.P.C has not been allowed with respect to search and seizure. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event his arrest/surrender

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3170 of 2020(2) dt.28-02-2020 2/2

¶17

within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Excise) cum IXth Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No.317 of 2019 on the following conditions:

¶18

“(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the tiral and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶19

(2) If the petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.”

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

SUMIT/-

¶22

U T

Om Prakash Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devi Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Pankaj Mahto @ Pankaj Kumar Mahato Vs the State of Bihar

Mohan Chaudhary @ Shivjee Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sudist Kumar Singh @ Sudisth Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Ram Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Ramjee @ Rama Vs The State of Bihar