Allowed

Bikash Yadav @ Bikash Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Nov 2020CR. MISC./29002/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case under sections 341, 504, 323 and 395 IPC, holding that his custody should be terminated. The court directed the issuance of bail bonds with specific conditions regarding the bailor and appearance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions regarding bailor relations and appearance.

Bikash Yadav @ Bikash Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 29002 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2020 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BIKASH YADAV @ BIKASH KUMAR YADAV Son of Prashuram Yadav Resident of Village- Kateyan, P.S.- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 10-11-2020

¶12

As of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

¶13

The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology.

¶14

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP is appearing for the State as it is submitted that the brief has been allotted to him by the office of Advocate General.

¶15

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State.

¶16

This Court would expect that the petitioner’s Counsel would honour his undertaking in the instant proceedings regarding supply of requisite court fee etc. within two weeks from the date he is called upon to do so by the office.

¶17

Petitioner seeks bail in Bihiya PS Case No. 76 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 504, 323 and 395 of the IPC.

¶18

While the informant’s vehicle ws being repaired, eight – ten unknown persons have allegedly indulged in assault and abuse and taken away some cash.

¶19

It is submitted by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner having no antecedent has falsely been implicated in this

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 29002 of 2020(2) dt.10-11-2020 2/2

¶21

case merely on the basis of confidential information given by the spy that the petitioner was found moving on the motorcycle in the vicinity of place of occurrence on the next day. It is submitted that there is no recovery from the petitioner of any incriminating materials. He is in custody since 20.3.2020.

¶22

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶23

Considering the rival submissions as also the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

¶24

Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM XII Bhojpur at Ara in Bihiya PS Case No. 76 of 2020 subject to the following conditions:-

¶25

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶26

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.

¶27

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶28

SNkumar/-

¶29

U T

Bikash Yadav @ Bikash Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bikash Yadav @ Bikash Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandeshwar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pahari Ram @ Suraj Ram @ Nepalia Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Yugeshwar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotelal Sahani Vs The State of Bihar