Allowed

Bashist Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Dec 2020CR. MISC./28839/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with allegations under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court held no prima facie case is made out due to the alleged false implication and nature of the seized illicit liquor.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions under CrPC 438(2) and surrender within six weeks.

Bashist Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28839 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2020 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BASHIST SINGH Son of Gorakh Singh Resident of Village- Dhatiwna, P.S.- Thawe, District- Gopalganj.

¶5

Ranjan Singh Son of Ramesh Singh Resident of Village- Dhatiwna, P.S.Thawe, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Pd. Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 03-12-2020

¶12

The present petition has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video Conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID-19 Pandemic.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Anil Pd. Singh, the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Thawe PS case no. 18 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(A) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016/18.

¶15

The allegation is regarding recovery of 9.9 liters of illicit liquor from the partly constructed house of the petitioner no. 1.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28839 of 2020(2) dt.03-12-2020 2/3

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent, have been falsely implicated in the present case and are having clean antecedent. The learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the petitioner no. 1 is staying far away from the partly constructed inhabitable house whereas the petitioner no. 2 is neither the owner of the said house in question nor has got anything to do with the illicit liquor recovered by the police, hence the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act are not attracted.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the fact that the petitioners are having clean antecedent and illicit liquor has been recovered from the house under construction, I find that prima facie no case is made out under the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, as far as consideration of the present bail petition is concerned, thus the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act, 2016 shall not be an impediment for the purposes of grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein, as such, I deem it fit and appropriate to admit the petitioners to the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the abovenamed

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28839 of 2020(2) dt.03-12-2020 3/3

¶20

petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Gopalganj in connection with Thawe PS case no. 18 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶22

rinkee/-

¶23

U T

Bashist Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bashist Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shambhu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Srivastav @ Vikash Kumar Srivatava Vs The State of Bihar

Rinki Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Dharamnath Rai @ Handa Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Ajit Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar