Patna HC rejected the petitioner's plea for anticipatory bail in a Section 30(a) excise case due to a specific allegation that 4.5 litres of intoxicant syrup was recovered from his house.
Prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2772 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-908 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- East Champaran
======================================================
Kaushal Gupta 40 Yrs. Male, S/o - Ramayodhya Prasad Resident of VillageMachhali Bazar, P.S.- Raxaul, Distt- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Excise Case
No. 908 of 2019 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
In view of specific allegation of recovery of 4.5 litres
of intoxicant syrup from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail.
The prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)
anay
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in an excise case with an allegation of intoxicant recovery from his house.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kaushal Gupta
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
