Allowed

Sunil Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2020CR. MISC./24233/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner Sunil Kumar Sah in a case involving IPC offences. The Court released him on behalf bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, subject to statutory conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the CJM, Siwan.

Sunil Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24233 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUNIL KUMAR SAH, Son of Jay Sri Sah, Resident of Village - Madakan Ke Tola, P.S.- Hussainganj, District - Siwan.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anuj Kr. Srivastava ======================================================

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 04-12-2020

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354 (B), 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Prosecution case in brief is that on 05.10.2019, the petitioner torn informant’s cloth due to which she disrobed her modesty and the petitioner tried to commit forcefully. She made a noise and on hulla her brother namely Upendra Kumar Sah came to rescue in the meantime, the co-accused persons assaulted her family members by means of Gadasi, Iron rod, Lathi and Labada. The petitioner also snatched her Mangal Sutra and one mobile worth of Rs. 45,000/-.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no specific overact against the petitioner and there

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24233 of 2020(3) dt.04-12-2020 2/2

¶15

is land dispute between the parties. There is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in the case diary, it has admitted that there is land dispute between the parties. The injury report shows that simple in nature.

¶17

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail petition.

¶18

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siwan Mahila P. S. Case No. 83 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶20

amitkumar/-

¶21

U T

Sunil Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parwej Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Sharma @ Rajesh Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Ramjee Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bihari Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotan Das @ Ram Sukul Das @ Ramsukal Vs The State of Bihar

Amiri Devi @ Omri Devi @ Somri Devi Vs the State of Bihar