Allowed

Rajesh Roy @ Rajesh Ray v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Sept 2020CR. MISC./24190/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 272, 273, and 34 IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, the petitioner, falsely implicated in a liquor forgery case, sought release. The single judge allowed the bail application, directing release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to regular attendance and no tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on equal terms for default upon furnishing the security.

Rajesh Roy @ Rajesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24190 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2019 Thana- MANIGACHI District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajesh Roy @ Rajesh Ray S/O Jagdish Roy Residence of Vill/Mohalla - Mahthaur, P.S. - Manigachi, Distt. - Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kedar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Pd.Singh ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

21-09-2020

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in G.O. Case No. 458 of

¶14

2019, arising out of Manigachi P.S. Case No. 86 of 2019, registered for the offence under Sections 272, 273, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

228 bottles of country-made wine, each containing 300 ml. (total 68.400 liters), are said to have been recovered from the orchard of co-accused Shambhu Rai and on his disclosure, petitioner has been made accused.

¶16

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24190 of 2020(2) dt.21-09-2020 2/2

¶18

that recovery has been made from the orchard of co-accused Shambhu Rai. Petitioner has got no concern with the aforesaid recovery and he is in custody since 19-02-2020.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail application is allowed.

¶20

Let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Darbhanga in connection with G.O. Case No. 458 of 2019, arising out of Manigachi P.S. Case No. 86 of 2019 on the following conditions:

¶21

“(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶22

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.”.

¶23

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶24

anay/-

¶25

U T

Rajesh Roy @ Rajesh Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Roy @ Rajesh Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Chunnu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Abul Hassan Vs The State of Bihar

Madhav Kumar Vs The State of Bihar