Allowed

Md. Akabar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Sept 2020CR. MISC./24030/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving the recovery of 60 litres of wine under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, directed to furnish a bond with sureties and submit to conditions regarding trial cooperation and non-tampering.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Md. Akabar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24030 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2020 Thana- BAJPATTI District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Akabar Son of Md. Ajij Resident of Village - Madhuban Bazar, P.S. - Bajpatti, District - Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Pd. Singh

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

17-09-2020

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P. for the State through Video Conferencing.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 97 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016.

¶16

As per prosecution case, 60 litres of Nepali Saufi wine is alleged to have been recovered from a bush near funeral ghat and on the disclosure of villagers, petitioner’s name has come.

¶17

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics and enmity. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way related with the said recovery. Provisions of 100 Cr.P.C. has not been followed

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24030 of 2020(2) dt.17-09-2020 2/2

¶19

with respect to search and seizure. Petitioner is in custody since 28-04-2020.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge (Excise), Sitamarhi in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 97 of 2020, subject to following conditions:-

¶21

(i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

¶22

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶23

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)

¶24

anay

¶25

U T

Md. Akabar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Akabar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Phul Hasan @ Phool Hasan @ Phul Md. Miyan Vs The State of Bihar

Malti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Gyanti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Dilshad Ansari @ Dillo Vs the State of Bihar

Shankar Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Aanand Kumar Ray @ Biku Ray @ Anand Rai @ Vikku Rai Vs the State of Bihar