Allowed

Vikash Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Dec 2020CR. MISC./23935/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners in a case involving illegal sand transport and failure to pay royalty/cess. The petitioners had clean antecedents and offered to pay the loss caused to the State. Bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within four weeks. (3 sentences, approx. 96 characters)

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail admitted; directed to furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount to the C.J.M., Banka, within four weeks.

Vikash Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Environment and Pollution | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23935 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2020 Thana- BANKA District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. VIKASH SAH Son of Maheshwar Sah Resident of Village- Chandpur, P.O. and P.S.- Gogri, District- Khagaria.

¶5

Chandan Kumar Son of Sanjeev Prasad @ Sanjeev Mandal Resident at Ward no.6, P.O. and P.S.- Gochhari, District- Khagaria.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brajesh Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 01-12-2020

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Amitesh Kumar, the learned APP appearing for the State.

¶13

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 169 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 8(a), 8(b) of the BMPITS Rule 2002 Amended 2014, Section 40 of the BMMC Rule, Section 21(i), 21(4) of the BMMDR Act 1957 and Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act.

¶14

The case of the prosecution in brief is that on

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23935 of 2020(3) dt.01-12-2020 2/3

¶16

29.02.2020, the informant along with other police personnel had arrived at Vindi village and while they were conducting inspection, they saw a truck loaded with sand coming from the opposite side and on seeing the police personnel, the driver of the said vehicle fled away. Upon apprehending the said vehicle and upon search, it transpired that the said truck was loaded with 1000 CFT of sand.

¶17

The learned counsel for petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent, they have been falsely implicated in the present case and they are having clean antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioners are owner and driver of the truck in question and they are ready to pay the amount of loss suffered by the State Government on account of non-payment of the royalty / cess amount.

¶18

Per contra, the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23935 of 2020(3) dt.01-12-2020 3/3

¶21

into account the fact that the petitioners are having clean antecedent and they are ready to pay the cess amount / the amount of loss caused to the State Government, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioners to the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Banka P.S.Case No. 169 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶23

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶24

Ajay/-

¶25

U T

Vikash Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Prasad Sinha Vs the Vigilance Investigation Bureau Govt. of Bihar ,Patna

Raj Kishore Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Meera Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Govind Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Dhaneshwar Sah Vs the State of Bihar