Allowed

Tuntun Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Oct 2020CR. MISC./23856/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused in a Sessions case. The Court noted the earlier rejection of bail after a four-month interval and directed release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, one being a close relative.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, one being a close relative.

Tuntun Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23856 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2013 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Tuntun Yadav, S/o Bilas Yadav, Resident of Village- Bharatkhand Yadubans Nagar Tola, Police station- Parbatta, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Viveka Nand Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 06-10-2020

¶14

In view of the submission and undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, at the time of hearing of this application through Video Conferencing, that he would remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the stamp reporter, within two weeks of starting of the Court proceeding in physical mode, he is permitted to remove the same accordingly.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State through Video Conferencing.

¶16

The petitioner is accused in connection with Sessions Case No. 107A of 2015, arising out of Parbatta P.S. Case No. 23 of 2013, registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 384 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23856 of 2020(2) dt.06-10-2020 2/2

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 06.03.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 73221 of 2019 by this Court with an observation that petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after four months and now more than four months has already elapsed. It is further submitted that in the present case, petitioner is in custody since 06.03.2019.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case and the observation made in the order dated 06.03.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 73221 of 2019, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Assistant Sessions Judge-II, Khagaria, in connection with Sessions Case No. 107A of 2015, arising out of Parbatta P.S. Case No. 23 of 2013. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.

¶20

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶21

Bhardwaj/-

¶22

U T

Tuntun Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tuntun Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mintu Giri Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Prasad Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Kusum Devi @ Kushum Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Badal @ Chandramohan Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Abhijeet Kumar Singh @ Chhatu @ Abhijeet Kumar @ Chhotu Vs The State of Bihar