Allowed

Amrit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Sept 2020CR. MISC./23171/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to petitioner Amrit Kumar in a bail application. The petitioner was detained since May 28, 2019, for theft of electronic goods. The court noted allegations of false implication via village politics and lack of recovered evidence against him.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of like amount each.

Amrit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23171 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2019 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AMRIT KUMAR S/o Nepali Mandal Resident of Village-Indiragram, P.S.Kursela, District-Katihar. ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Sanchay Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Addl Public Prosecutor ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 08-09-2020

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State via Video conferencing.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 457/380 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Prosecution’s case, in brief, is that in the wee hours three to four unknown miscreants entered into informant’s shop and took away TV sets, Mixer and other electronic goods.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 28.5.2019. petitioner’s name has been surfaced on the basis of his self confession, though nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused has already been allowed bail by the Court below itself vide Bail Petition No. 395 of 2019.

¶14

In the facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner mentioned above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23171 of 2020(2) dt.08-09-2020 2/2

¶16

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Kursela Police Station Case No. 84 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

¶17

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶18

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶20

Shashi

¶21

U T

Amrit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritesh Sah @ Nitesh Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Sujeet Kumar Sahani @ Sujeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lakshman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar