Allowed

Sahib Iqbal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Sept 2020CR. MISC./22463/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in a special leave context during COVID-19 lockdown, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheque and dowry-related matter, directing him to surrender within eight weeks and subjecting him to standard bail conditions and further bond furnishing post-normalcy.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on personal bond; directed to surrender within 8 weeks and furnish Rs. 10,000 surety bonds within 7 weeks of normalcy.

Sahib Iqbal Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22463 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2019 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SAHID IQBAL, aged about 27 years (Male), S/o Md. Taiyab, Resident of Village- Choti Ballia Chakmakhan Tola, P.S.- Ballia Chakmakhan Tola, P.S.Ballia, Distt- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Yogendra Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 01-09-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶12

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of lifting of the lockdown in the State of Bihar.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that due to typographical error, the name of the petitioner has been wrongly typed as ‘Sahib Iqbal’ in place of ‘Sahid Iqbal’ in the bail application. Likewise, in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application, it has been mentioned that the petitioner has no

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22463 of 2020(2) dt.01-09-2020 2/4

¶16

criminal antecedent whereas the petitioner has been made accused in one case.

¶17

Considering the same, let the name of the petitioner be read as ‘Sahid Iqbal’ in place of ‘Sahib Iqbal’ in the bail application. Further, in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application, it should be read that the petitioner has been made accused in one case.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 498(A) and 313/34 of the I.P.C.

¶20

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 06.04.2018 the marriage of the informant was solemnized with this petitioner. Thereafter, this petitioner and other accused persons tortured the victim due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand. When she said to her mother-in-law about her pregnancy, her mother-in-law gave order to this petitioner to get her pregnancy demolished. On objection, this petitioner assaulted her with leg on her stomach and then she fell down on the earth due to pain. Her Nanad Sadika Praveen dragged her in the courtyard and by sprinkling Kerosene Oil, gave order to Md. Sakib and Md.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22463 of 2020(2) dt.01-09-2020 3/4

¶22

Shahnawaz to kill her. When the aforesaid persons came with the pot of Kerosene Oil, the informant cried and on her cry, family members assembled there and then she could be saved. In the night at about 7.00 O’clock, stomach pain developed and blood began to come out from her private part and then she went to a doctor with her father. She has suspicion that her child died or her abortion succeeded.

¶23

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is the husband of the victim. There is no medical evidence in support of offence under Section 313 of I.P.C. Rest of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶24

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner above named, in the event

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22463 of 2020(2) dt.01-09-2020 4/4

¶27

of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai, in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 300/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶28

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of seven weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶29

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶30

U.K./- U T

Sahib Iqbal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahib Iqbal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadhu Ssahni Vs The State of Bihar

Lalmuni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Atul Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Suhail @ Suhbaril Ansari @ Suhail Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Basant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chitranjan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar