Allowed

Manish Kumar @ Manish Baitha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jul 2020CR. MISC./21827/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in connection with offences relating to illicit liquor, directing release on bonds with sureties after considering the period of custody and clean antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the Satisfaction of the Special Judge (Excise Act), Sitamarhi.

Manish Kumar @ Manish Baitha Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21827 of 2020

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2020 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Manish Kumar @ Manish Baitha, aged about 22 years, male, Son of Late Nathuni Baitha, Resident of Village - Dekuli Dharampur, Ward No.8, P.S.Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 08-07-2020

¶16

Heard Mr. Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nand Kumar, learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner, who is in custody since 25.02.2020 and claims to be a person of clean antecedent, seeks bail in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 43 of 2020, dated 25.02.2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 414, 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21827 of 2020(2) dt.08-07-2020 2/2

¶19

From the two motorcycles, which were being driven by the petitioner and another, altogether 19 litres of liquor is said to have been recovered.

¶20

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the recovery has wrongly been saddled upon him.

¶21

Regard being had to the period of custody of the petitioner and his clean antecedent, he is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd A.D.J.-Cum-Special Judge (Excise Act), Sitamarhi in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 43 of 2020.

¶22

The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶24

Praveen-II/-

Manish Kumar @ Manish Baitha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar @ Manish Baitha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sujeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Patel @ Prakash Kumar Patel Vs the State of Bihar

Ganesh Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Subi Khatoon @ Subi Khaton Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Binesh Sahni @ Binesh Kumar Sahni @ Bhulla Vs the State of Bihar