Allowed

Chhotu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Jun 2020CR. MISC./20046/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous application for bail arising from a dacoity and arms offence case, the High Court granted provisional bail to the petitioner for three months subject to furnishing a surety, with liberty to cancel in case of breach.

What did the court decide?

Release on provisional bail for three months with one surety, subject to confirmation and strict conditions regarding antecedents and appearance.

Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20046 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2019 Thana- PANJWARA District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

CHHOTU KUMAR, S/o Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Janidih, P.S.- Ghogha, Distt- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 29-06-2020

¶12

The matter has been taken up through virtual Court proceeding.

¶13

Since the physical Court is not functional due to the present pandemic, Covid-19, the matter has been listed with defects.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect/s within a period of three weeks on resumption of physical court proceeding.

¶15

In case of non-removal of the defect/s within the undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the bench.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner has preferred the present application for

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20046 of 2020(2) dt.29-06-2020 2/4

¶19

grant of bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act, 1959.

¶20

The prosecution case as per the Self Statement of S.I., Murlidhar Sah recorded on 19.09.2019 at 4.30 P.M. is to the effect that on the same day at 1.00 P.M., a secret information was received that 7-8 miscreants are preparing to commit dacoity. Consequently, a raid was laid and on seeing the police party, all the accused persons borne on three motorcycles started fleeing away from the scene, but on chase being made, they were apprehended. During frisking, from the possession of the petitioner, one loaded country made pistol with one cartridge and a mobile phone were recovered.

¶21

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that maliciously the petitioner has been framed in the present case. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.09.2019 and the investigation has already been concluded. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is accused in six other cases, but he has been granted bail in those cases.

¶22

Learned APP for the State submits that the said recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20046 of 2020(2) dt.29-06-2020 3/4

¶24

and he is having serious criminal antecedent.

¶25

Considering the fact that the investigation has already been concluded, let the petitioner above named be released on bail for the present provisionally for a period of three months on furnishing one surety to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-I, Banka, in connection with Panjwara P.S. Case No. 103 of 2019.

¶26

However, in view of the present pandemic, COVID19, it will be open for the learned Court below to accept the bail bond on furnishing an undertaking by the surety, on photo copy of his Aadhar Card, to the effect that he is ready to become the bailor of the petitioner which may be transmitted by such surety to the learned Court concerned through e-mode.

¶27

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned Court below within three months on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties, including one surety given at the time of provisional bail, of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-I, Banka, in connection with Panjwara P.S. Case No. 103 of 2019.

¶28

However, keeping in view the serious criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the learned Court below is at liberty

¶29

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20046 of 2020(2) dt.29-06-2020 4/4

¶30

to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he substantially gets involved in similar nature of offence or if he fails to appear before the learned Court below on three consecutive occasions.

¶31

The learned Court below will further be at liberty to extend the period of provisional bail further if the court proceeding in physical mode will not resume in next three months.

¶32

Accordingly, the present application stands disposed

¶33

of.

¶34

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶35

Ashwini/-

¶36

U T

Chhotu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhotu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumitra Jaiswal Vs The State of Bihar

Mahil Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vijay Jha @ Vijay Ojha Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar