Allowed

Binod Rai v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC28 May 2020CR. MISC./1987/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting bail to two petitioners accused under Sections 302, 201, and 34 of the IPC in a death caused by involving in-laws. The High Court ordered their release subject to sureties and specific conditions regarding court attendance and evidence tampering.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions of cooperation and non-tampering.

Binod Rai Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1987 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2005 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Binod Rai Son of Janak Yadav @ Janakdeo Rai Resident of Village - Harpur Kothi, P.S.- Janta Bazar, District - Saran.

¶5

Pramod Rai Son of Janak Yadav @ Janakdeo Rai Resident of Village - Harpur Kothi, P.S.- Janta Bazar, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Harish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 28-05-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as

¶13

learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing.

¶14

This relates to grant of bail in Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 160 of 2005, registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per prosecution case, son of the informant went to his in-laws house for Bidai of his wife, but he did not return. It is further alleged by the informant that his son was killed by his in-laws members, including petitioners.

¶16

It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that petitioners are brothers-in-law of deceased and have falsely been implicated in this case due to suspicion. There is no eye-witness

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1987 of 2020(4) dt.28-05-2020 2/2

¶18

to the alleged occurrence. Petitioners are in custody since 23-11-2019, having no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above-named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saran in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 160 of 2005 on the following conditions:

¶20

“(1) Petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶21

(2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.”.

¶22

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)

¶23

anay

¶24

U T

Binod Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binod Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Kumar @ Satish Raj @ Santosh Kumar @ Satish Kumar Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Shakhi Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kanhaiya Sahni @ Kanahaiya Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Patel Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Miyan Vs The State of Bihar