Allowed

Anjesh Kumar Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jan 2020CR. MISC./188/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court, in a bail petition arising from a case of suspected medical negligence, granted regular bail to the accused. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and was ordered not to leave the country without court permission.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj.

Anjesh Kumar Dubey Vs The State of Bihar — Medical Negligence | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.188 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2019 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anjesh Kumar Dubey Son of Madan Dubey @ Madan Dube Resident of Village - Basant Chhapra, P.S.- Mohammadpur, District - Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shakti Suman Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anita Kumari Singh ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 16-01-2020

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶12

learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mohammadpur P.S.Case No.195 of 2019 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Mother of the informant died during course of treatment by Dr. Arvind Kumar Pandey. Petitioner was a compunder thereat. Suspicion is that the death was result of negligence of the doctor and the petitioner. The doctor is a qualified person for Alopathy treatment, hence this case appears to be of medical negligence.

¶15

Considering the entire facts especially the fact that there is no material to suggest that the petitioner is going to

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.188 of 2020(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2

¶17

tamper with the evidence or abscond the process of law, let the above named petitioner be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Ist Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Mohammadpur P.S.Case No.195 of 2019, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and also that the petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the Court below.

¶18

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶19

B.Kr./-

¶20

U T

Anjesh Kumar Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anjesh Kumar Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitish Kumar @ Satyam Vs The State of Bihar

Jaksan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Kr. @ Binod Kr. Vs The State of Bihar

Lakhan Das Vs The State of Bihar

Sahdev Ravidas Vs the State of Bihar