Oral order where the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application as withdrawn upon counsel submission regarding custody of petitioners.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17837 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2019 Thana- DAUDPUR District- Saran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
3 15-12-2020
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that during pendency of this application both the petitioners have been taken into custody and as such he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
In view of the above, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Bibhash/-
U
Prakash Sah
Shankar Sah
The State of Bihar
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
