Bipin Rai @ Binay Kumar @ Vinay Kumar v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail due to his conduct of absconding for over three years after the first rejection and allegations of assaulting the informant. The petitioner was directed to surrender within six weeks to seek regular bail.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected; the petitioner was directed to surrender within six weeks to seek regular bail.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16867 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2016 Thana- KARTAHA District- Vaishali
======================================================
BIPIN RAI @ BINAY KUMAR @ VINAY KUMAR S/o Ambika Rai R/o village- Gurmia, P.S.- Kartahan, District- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
2 14-08-2020 This case has been heard through video-conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BIPIN RAI @ BINAY KUMAR @ VINAY KUMAR
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court