Allowed

Urmila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Sept 2020CR. MISC./16196/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted anticipatory bail to Urmila Devi, the mother of the deceased in a joint murder-chargesheet (Sections 302, 34 IPC). The court observed the petitioner's age and presence of motive/caste-blight, allowing bail upon surrender within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner enlarged on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount within eight weeks.

Urmila Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 16196 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2019 Thana- JIRADEI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Urmila Devi W/o Vijay Barnawal R/o village- Badheya, P.S.- Zeeradei, District- Siwan, (Mother of deceased)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Kant For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Rita Verma ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

04-09-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶13

learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Zeeradei P.S. Case No. 55 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 328, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per prosecution case, marriage of daughter of the informant was solemnized with son (deceased) of petitioner in the year 2017, but on 14-06-2019, the informant received a telephonic call from his daughter that her husband (deceased) has been taken away on roof by her in-laws and they have given him some thing to eat, as a result of which, he died.

¶16

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is mother of the deceased and has falsely been implicated in this case by her samadhi (informant). In fact, the present case is counter blast of a case, which was filed by husband of petitioner

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16196 of 2020(2) dt.04-09-2020 2/2

¶18

one day prior to the present case, vide Jeeradei P.S. Case No. 54 of 2019, against his two sons, daughter-in-law and Samadhi (informant of the present case). It is further submitted that two sons of petitioner are habitual drunker and they were sent to jail earlier on the complaint made by husband of petitioner. It is also submitted that there is no eye-witness to the alleged occurrence and it cannot be presumed that petitioner, who is 69 years old and mother of the deceased, would kill her own son.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶20

In the event of arrest or surrender within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate 1^st , Siwan, in connection with Zeeradei P.S. Case No. 55 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)

¶22

anay

¶23

U T

Urmila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Urmila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Babu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Prasad @ Mukesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Sulendra Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Bisundeo Yadav @ Bisun Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Binod Seth @ Vinod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chotu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar