Allowed

Harbansh Thakur @ Haribansh Thakur @ Harivansh Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 May 2020CR. MISC./1560/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna allowed bail to the petitioner, a carpenter falsely implicated in a criminal case, who was in custody since October 2019. The court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under strict conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of the like amount.

Harbansh Thakur @ Haribansh Thakur @ Harivansh Thakur Vs The… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1560 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1083 Year-2019 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

HARBANSH THAKUR @ HARIBANSH THAKUR @ HARIVANSH THAKUR S/O Late Suryadeo Thakur R/O Vill Mohdaiya, P.S. Minapur, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.Madan Kumar, I/C APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

5 27-05-2020 Heard the parties and perused the case diary.

¶10

This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶11

The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for an offence punishable under section 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. He submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 14.10.2019. Charge sheet has also been filed in the case. Petitioner is poor carpenter and his identity card was used for taking the forged SIM card.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1560 of 2020(5) dt.27-05-2020 2/2

¶14

Learned Addl.P.P. did not controvert the facts.

¶15

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances

¶16

of the case, let both the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Ahiyapur Police Station Case No. 1083 of 2019/GR No. 4959 of 2019 on the following conditions:-

¶17

(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail-bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶18

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶20

Shashi

¶21

U T

Harbansh Thakur @ Haribansh Thakur @ Harivansh Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harbansh Thakur @ Haribansh Thakur @ Harivansh Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Pandey Vs Chairman Cum Managing Director State Bank Of India and Ors.

Mohmad Altamash Vs the State of Bihar

Chhote Lal Mahto @ Chhotu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Satish Kumar @ Satish Raj @ Santosh Kumar @ Satish Kumar Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Shakhi Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.