Allowed

Shiv Chandra Murmu @ Talay Murmu @ Master v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Mar 2020CR. MISC./14441/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal batch matter, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under Sections 272, 273 of IPC and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 regarding recovery of liquor.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise, Purnea.

Shiv Chandra Murmu @ Talay Murmu @ Master Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14441 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2018 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHIV CHANDRA MURMU @ TALAY MURMU @ MASTER S/o Late Siro Murmu Resident of Village- Fultola, P.S.- Dhamdaha, District- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Asha Devi ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-03-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

Prosecution case, in short, is that 10 liters wine is recovered.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.8.2019. Chargesheet/prosecution report has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 10 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14441 of 2020(2) dt.02-03-2020 2/2

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Excise, Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 265/2018.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Pankaj/-

¶22

U T

Shiv Chandra Murmu @ Talay Murmu @ Master v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Chandra Murmu @ Talay Murmu @ Master v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Singho Yadav @ Singheswar Yadav @ Sinho Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar @ Sunny @ Chintu Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Lalan Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Taj Vs The State of Bihar

Nandan Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

M. Munna Vs The State of Bihar