Allowed

Nagendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Feb 2020CR. MISC./1150/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who faced arrest in a liquor case based solely on a co-accused confession, noting the lack of physical evidence against him. Bail was ordered on a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail for a period of twelve weeks on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Nagendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1150 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2019 Thana- PARSA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nagendra Singh, S/o Late Jodha Singh, R/o village- Pure Chapra, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 27-02-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the

¶13

State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

The prosecution case is to the effect that on secret information that co-accused Shivnath Manjhi has stored the illicit liquor and is trading the same, raid was laid and coaccused Shivnath Manjhi was apprehended and from his house, 20.400 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor were recovered. The apprehended co-accused Shivnath Manjhi disclosed that he has brought the seized liquor from the petitioner.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the recovery has not been made from the conscious physical

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1150 of 2020(2) dt.27-02-2020 2/2

¶18

possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name subsequently sprang up on the confession of apprehended co-accused person. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is made accused in two other cases, though a supplementary affidavit has been filed to the effect that in those cases, he is on bail.

¶19

Learned APP submits that the name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of apprehended co-accused person.

¶20

Considering the fact that the recovery has not been made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Excise, Saran at Chapra in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 195 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶21

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

Amrendra/-

¶23

U T

Nagendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kevat Vs the State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Subham Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Shahnawaz Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar