The High Court granted the petitioner's request for permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition and dismissed it as withdrawn since the petitioner was arrested during its pendency.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10742 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2019 Thana- BALIGAON District- Vaishali
====================================================== SANJU RAY S/o Hardeo Ray R/o village- Mahua Singh Rai, P.S.- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Ranjan No.II For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
4 06-10-2020
Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. II, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this application the petitioner - Sanju Ray, S/o- Hardeo Ray has been arrested, as such, this petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this petition.
Permission is granted.
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Mr. Binod Kumar No. 3, learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, learned counsel for the informant are present.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
praful/-
U T
Sanju Ray
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
