Partly allowed

Jai Prakash Gope v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jun 2020CR. MISC./10625/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order dismisses an anticipatory bail application for petitioner no. 2 as infructuous due to his arrest. For petitioner no. 1, the court granted bail after finding no specific allegations against him in the FIR and no criminal antecedent, releasing him on a bond under CrPC Section 438(2).

What did the court decide?

Application for petitioner no. 2 dismissed as infructuous; application for petitioner no. 1 allowed; release on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

Jai Prakash Gope Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10625 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-555 Year-2019 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. JAI PRAKASH GOPE S/o Rama Nand Prasad Resident of VillageDayalpur, P.S.- Hilsa, Distt- Nalanda.

¶5

Dinesh Kumar Son of Rama Nand Prasad Resident of Village- Dayalpur, P.S.- Hilsa, Distt- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 25-06-2020

¶13

Learned Counsel for the petitioners informs that the petitioner no. 2, Dinesh Kumar, has been arrested by the police during the pendency of this application and this application, so far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, has become infructuous.

¶14

Accordingly, this application, so far as petitioner no. 2, is concerned, is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶15

This application will now survive only for petitioner

¶16

no. 1.

¶17

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner no. 1 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State, through Video Conferencing.

¶18

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10625 of 2020(2) dt.25-06-2020 2/3

¶20

out of Hilsa Police Station Case No. 555 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 341/379/323/504/354-A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code

¶21

The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, along with other accused persons, assaulted the informant and snatched away golden ear-ring worth Rs. 30,000/-.

¶22

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner inasmuch as from perusal of the First Information Report, it is evident that the allegation of assault is upon other co-accused persons. He further submits that the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

¶23

Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that no overt act has been alleged against the petitioner and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, I am inclined to grant the petitioner no. 1 privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶24

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶25

Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10625 of 2020(2) dt.25-06-2020 3/3

¶27

from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with Hilsa Police Station Case No. 555 of 2019, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶28

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶29

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶30

U √ T √

Jai Prakash Gope v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Prakash Gope v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Abdul Motalib Vs the State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Tatwa @ Ajay kumar Tatwa Vs The State of Bihar

Dewan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Soni Kumari Vs The State of Bihar