Allowed

Binod Chaurasia v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jun 2020CR. MISC./10502/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to a petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC. The investigation was complete, there was no eyewitness, and the petitioner had taken the victim for treatment. Bail was granted with a monetary bond and sureties. Provisional release on personal bond was allowed due to the lockdown.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on a bail bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties. If unable to furnish sureties, he shall be provisionally released on personal bond.

Binod Chaurasia Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10502 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2019 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BINOD CHAURASIA Son of Late Lalo Prasad Arya Resident of Village - Saraiya, P.S.- Chautham, Distt - Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 01-06-2020

¶13

The matter has been taken up through video

¶14

conferencing.

¶15

Heard the parties.

¶16

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Allegation against the petitioner is of commission of murder of his wife, however, the FIR would reveal that it was not a case of murder rather the petitioner took the victim for treatment to the hospital and if the petitioner would have been killer he must not have done like that. Petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2019. Investigation of the case is already complete. There is no eye witness of the occurrence.

¶18

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10502 of 2020(3) dt.01-06-2020 2/2

¶20

bail.

¶21

Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Chautham Police Station Case No.191 of 2019, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶22

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

¶23

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶24

Nitesh/-

¶25

U T

Binod Chaurasia v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binod Chaurasia v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Lal Bhaiya @ Moti Lal Bhaiya Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Raut Vs The State of Bihar

Bharat Mahto @ Bharat Kumar @ Prabindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Sinha @ Ashok Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Vikas Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abul Hayat Vs The State of Bihar