Prince Kumar appealed against an order rejecting his bail in a case involving fatal shooting and caste-related offences. The Single Judge affirmed the lower court's decision, holding the bail prayer rejected and dismissing the appeal.
Prayer for bail of the appellant stands rejected; Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4571 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2018 Thana- HAJIPUR District- Vaishali
======================================================
Prince Kumar, Son of Nand Kishore Singh, Resident of Village - Husena Khurd, P.S.- Garaul, District- Vaishali
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 22-05-2020
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned
counsel for the State through Video Conferencing.
This appeal, under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is directed against the order dated 23.08.2019 passed in Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 218 of 2018, registered under Sections 302, 353, 224 and 120B/34, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(2)3(2)(va) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby and whereunder the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge – cum-Special Judge, SC/St (POA) Act, Vaishali at Hajipur, rejected the prayer for grant of bail of the appellant.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4571 of 2019 dt.22-05-2020 2/3
The persecution case, in brief, is that on 03.04.2018, at about 9 P.M., Prince Kumar (appellant) was produced from Hajat in the court of Juvenile Justice Board, in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No. 71 of 2016 by Hawaldar, Ram Ekbal Ravidas. When Ram Ekbal Ravidas was returning from the court of Juvenile Justice Board then near the stair three unknown miscreants started firing making attempt to set free to Prince Kumar (appellant). At that time, scuffle started in between the miscreants and Ram Ekbal Ravidas. In the meantime, Prince Kumar (appellant) took pistol from one miscreant and fired at Hawaldar, Ram Ekqal Ravidas and fled away. While Hawaldar, Ram Ekwal Ravidas was rushed to the Sadar Hospita, Hajipur, but he was declared dead.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that while the informant and the witnesses in paragraphs 12, 13 and 14 of the case dairy, have claimed to be eye witness of the occurrence but they were not present at the time of occurrence rather they reached on hearing the sound of firing at the place of occurrence. Further submission is that in the present case, petitioner is in custody since 07.04.2018.
The informant and the witnesses, whose statement, as detailed in paragraphs 12, 13 and 14 of the case diary, have
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4571 of 2019 dt.22-05-2020 3/3
supported the prosecution case making allegation of firing by the petitioner at the deceased Hawaldar, Ram Ekbal Ravidas. The postmortem report as detailed in paragraph 115 of the case diary indicates that the deceased died due to firearm injury.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the appellant, the impugned order dated 23.08.2019 passed in Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 218 of 2018 is hereby affirmed and the prayer for bail of the appellant stands rejected. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
Bhardwaj/-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | |
| Uploading Date | 23.05.2020 |
| Transmission Date | 23.05.2020 |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the question of bail remains to be decided in the light of the serious nature of the atrocity and the offence.
Whether theejail for grant of bail arises from the impugned order dated 23.08.2019 rejecting the appellant's bail.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Prince Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
